Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Plane Engine Fire Shock As Qantas Boeing 747 Engine Bursts Into Flames On Flight From San Francisco

February 3, 2011 by chec  
Filed under Engine


A passenger plane travelling from San Francisco to Australia was forced to make an emergency landing after one of its engines burst into flames. A newly-wed returning from his honeymoon in the United States filmed the incident on his mobile phone about 15 minutes after take-off. The footage shows one of the Qantas Airways Boeing 747’s four engines shooting out sparks in a process known as “engine surge”. “I heard a thud, a bump and the plane veered off to the left,” passenger Nolan Goldstein told KTVU-TV. “It was very uncertain for a period of time until the captain announced that we had an engine that blew up. “It was a real uncomfortable vibration at first and then the plane began to shake a bit.” The crew shut down the affected engine before returning to San Francisco International Airport. A spokesman for Qantas Airways said the pilot dumped fuel over the Pacific as a precaution before the emergency landing. He said none of the 212 passengers and 18 crew were injured during the incident. “Engineers have determined the engine does need replacement, and they are checking to see what caused the problem,” he added. The flames created a large hole in the engine cowling. Experts said this kind of engine failure, where a piece of the engine breaks off and pierces the cowling, is “an extremely rare event”. Aviation consultant John Nance said Boeing 747s “are designed to actually lose three of four engines and still be able to get back”.

Comments

25 Responses to “Plane Engine Fire Shock As Qantas Boeing 747 Engine Bursts Into Flames On Flight From San Francisco”
  1. VertigaDesignMEDIA says:

    whats up with youtube uploading old vids

  2. Razazi747 says:

    The guy says it veered left but shouldnt it veer right because more thrust on the left hand side since it was one of the right engine that was surging?

  3. heywatchme101 says:

    @legomovies64 mistake I mean Qantas not QUANTAS typo.

  4. zaanstreek1980 says:

    @eveningniteshade hahahha so true!! ;-)

  5. houshidar558 says:

    @eveningniteshade your obviously an ignorant fuck, you would shit bricks if you didnt even know about planes and it burst into flames or had a surge.

  6. legomovies64 says:

    @heywatchme101 Nothing, because “QUANTAS” doesn’t exist.

    Qantas, on the other hand are great.

  7. Brad1711 says:

    Where are the flames?

  8. captainpilot27 says:

    The aircraft manufacturers doesen’t hold the problem. The maintenance has. Fist the Queen of the skies 747 now the Newly jumbo a380. But only qantas experince this kind of situation lately.

  9. KenanVideos says:

    “I don’t know if this is good” lol naa mate, it’s normal, they’re just anti-missile flares =p

  10. HumalDiscover says:

    EVEN IT IS VERY dangerous, people would still like to use it, like my mum

  11. mallamoozoo says:

    qantas has had so many fuckups in the last few years its not funny – about TEN major incidents like this.

  12. Miker3797 says:

    @eveningniteshade Go fuck yourself!

  13. heywatchme101 says:

    WTF IS WRONG WITH QUANTAS NOW?

  14. Pocok4 says:

    @tisoy909

    “But they arent americans, so the passengers were quiet, knowing they have nothing to live for anyways. ”

    only a braindead fucking nazi would say something like that!

  15. Fabinou34200 says:

    A380 plus 747… Someone is going to be fired at Qantas maintenance ! Or take a nap at guantanamo’s hotel… Who knows… :-)

  16. mnamcintyre says:

    Rolls royce are at fault

  17. donnyab says:

    @tisoy909
    Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall…read that book you are all so obsessed with over there.

  18. swjgt says:

    @JUFFAIR101 nah it’s just Qantas’ poor maintenance. Another Qantas 747 engine exploded taday, oh and don’t forget that Qantas A380 engine explosion yesterday.

  19. BusterBunker says:

    Actually, I would rather fly on an MD-11 before a twin engine jet. MD-11 does not apply to ETOPS. With a twin engine airplane, If they experience an engine failure, they would have to land right away. An Md-11 or another Tri-holder can keep flying to the airport of their choice.

  20. SouthAfricanAirways1 says:

    @JUFFAIR101 But on percentages, its one of the best aircraft to be on. There are at least 1418, 747s. and only 49 of them have been in accidents. If you look at percentages, its a very good figure. And personally, I prefer Boeing over Airbus.

  21. JUFFAIR101 says:

    @SouthAfricanAirways1
    I mean SAFTEY wich is the most important thing for me check the FATALITES ,HULL LOSS……
    UPS , JAPAN 123 , AIR TRANS, there is a lot more incedints
    u cant compare the 747 with the A340’s for example

  22. SouthAfricanAirways1 says:

    @JUFFAIR101 On what grounds? Thats probably the most STUPID comment EVER.

  23. swiitzerland says:

    @Stang70Fastback88 Oh please

  24. tisoy909 says:

    @eveningniteshade But they arent americans, so the passengers were quiet, knowing they have nothing to live for anyways.

  25. JUFFAIR101 says:

    747’s worst plane ever

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!

You must be logged in to post a comment.